Survey example: Event Attendee survey about exhibitor engagement
Create conversational survey example by chatting with AI.
This is an example of an AI survey about exhibitor engagement for event attendees—see and try the example now. Get inspired and see how a conversational survey feels in action.
It's surprisingly common for event organizers to struggle with collecting meaningful feedback from attendees on exhibitor engagement. Traditional surveys frustrate both the people who send them and the people expected to reply.
At Specific, we've spent years refining conversational survey tools to make feedback easy, effective, and actually enjoyable for everyone involved. All of the tools referenced here are part of Specific’s suite.
What is a conversational survey and why AI makes it better for event attendees
Most event organizers find that getting useful, actionable input about exhibitor engagement is tough. Regular survey forms tend to be ignored or filled out with minimal effort, which doesn’t move the needle or improve future events. Missing context, high drop-off rates, and vague answers cripple traditional surveys—but it doesn’t need to be this way.
This is where the “AI survey example” concept changes the game. Instead of blasting out forms, you now have a chat-based, smart solution. With an AI survey generator, you get:
Instant, context-aware question creation
Real-time, dynamic follow-ups based on attendee replies
A familiar chat experience that actually keeps people engaged
Unlike the old way—editing endless questions and hoping for substance—AI survey builders adapt in real time, making surveys feel like real conversations.
Manual Surveys | AI-Generated Surveys |
---|---|
Rigid forms, static questions | Adaptive, dynamic conversations |
Low response and completion rates | 70–90% completion rate (vs. 10–30% for old surveys) [1] |
Slow, manual analysis | Instant insights and summaries |
Feels like homework | Feels like chat—simple, mobile-friendly |
Why use AI for event attendee surveys?
AI-driven conversational surveys slash abandonment rates (down to 15–25% compared to 40–55% for traditional surveys [2]) and prompt higher quality, more specific feedback [3]. With Specific, we make every step—creation, distribution, and analysis—personalized and painless. For more advice about what to ask in this context, see best questions for event attendee surveys about exhibitor engagement or learn to create your own event attendee survey with our AI survey builder.
Specific offers a best-in-class conversational experience; respondents feel heard, and you get rich, actionable data—no follow-up emails necessary.
Automatic follow-up questions based on previous reply
The real superpower here is automatic AI follow-up questions—Specific’s chat-based logic listens to the attendee’s answer and instantly digs deeper where it matters. Instead of generic or one-size-fits-all interactions, you're getting feedback that’s rich in context, just as if an expert researcher were running the conversation—without extra labor.
Compare these possible replies:
Event attendee: “Some booths were fine, others I skipped.”
AI follow-up: “Which booths stood out to you, and what made those memorable?”
Without these smart, instant follow-ups, you’d just have to guess what “fine” means—or else start emailing attendees, wasting everyone’s time. With Specific’s automated AI follow-up questions, you get the clarity in real time—no chasing needed.
After seeing the AI at work, you’ll realize these automated follow-ups aren’t just an upgrade—they’re a new standard. Curious? Try generating a survey yourself—see what kind of nuanced insights you can pull from the conversation.
With deep follow-up, the survey isn’t just Q&A—it’s a real conversation, making it a true conversational survey that people actually want to finish.
Easy editing, like magic
Editing your event attendee exhibitor engagement survey with Specific feels like magic. Just open the chat, describe the change (like, “remove question 4 and add one about booth interactivity”), and our AI survey editor handles everything in seconds. No complicated forms, no sifting through endless options—the AI applies research best practices so you don’t have to.
Small tweaks or big overhauls? The AI does the heavy lifting. It’s like having an expert survey designer, on demand and in context.
Survey delivery options: landing pages and in-product
Whether you want to meet attendees where they are or grab their input on the fly, delivery is easy. Both methods work for exhibitor engagement surveys, but let’s break it down:
Sharable landing page surveys:
Easily email, message, or display surveys to attendees post-event
Ideal for hybrid events or those who can’t respond in-app
Perfect for wide distribution, especially if not everyone uses your event app
Embed the survey inside your event platform or conference app
Prompt attendees at just the right moment (e.g., after visiting exhibitor areas)
Gather context-rich impressions while memories are fresh
Event attendee exhibitor engagement feedback often benefits from being in the moment, right inside your app, but landing pages offer versatility if you want to reach a wider audience or follow up after the event.
AI-powered survey analysis, instantly
Once the results roll in, Specific’s AI survey analysis tools get to work. You don’t need spreadsheets or endless manual sorting—AI summarizes every attendee’s feedback, identifies top themes, and translates mountains of conversation into bite-sized, actionable insights (in seconds, not weeks) [2].
Features like automated topic detection and the ability to chat with AI about your survey responses change how you handle event feedback forever. See a step-by-step approach in how to analyze event attendee exhibitor engagement survey responses with AI.
See this exhibitor engagement survey example now
Ready for more insightful, actionable feedback? See what a real AI-powered, conversational survey looks like—see and try this exhibitor engagement survey example now and experience the difference.
Related resources
Sources
superagi.com. AI vs. Traditional Surveys: A Comparative Analysis of Automation, Accuracy, and User Engagement in 2025
superagi.com. AI Survey Tools vs. Traditional Methods: A Comparative Analysis of Efficiency and Accuracy
arxiv.org. Analysis of the Elicitation Techniques and Effects of AI-Powered Surveys vs. Traditional Surveys