This article will give you tips on how to analyze responses from a Conference Participants survey about Virtual Platform Usability using approaches that work—and save your time.
Choosing the right tools for analyzing conference participants' survey data
The approach and tooling you use depends entirely on the structure of your survey data. Here’s how I break it down:
Quantitative data: If your survey only asked Conference Participants to select from multiple choices (for example, “Rate this platform from 1-5”), you’re in luck. These results are straightforward to count and visualize in tools like Excel or Google Sheets. Just export, count, and chart.
Qualitative data: If your survey included open-ended questions or follow-up queries about the Virtual Platform Usability experience, that’s a different beast. Reading and summarizing hundreds of chatty, unstructured replies by hand is impossible—or at least painfully slow. For this, AI-based tools are a must.
With qualitative responses, you basically have two ways to analyze the data:
ChatGPT or similar GPT tool for AI analysis
Export and chat: One option is to export all your open-text responses (usually to CSV) and paste them into ChatGPT or a similar GPT tool. You can chat with the AI to extract themes, perform sentiment analysis, or generate summaries.
Trade-offs: This is workable for smaller surveys but becomes frustrating when:
Responses are too many and don't fit into ChatGPT context window.
You want to dig into subgroups—say, just responses from people who mentioned technical challenges or low engagement.
You lose the original metadata, structure, and detail from your survey design.
All-in-one tool like Specific
Purpose-built workflow: Specific is designed for exactly this. It collects survey responses in a conversational format, asks relevant AI-powered follow-up questions in real time (which increases the quality of the data), and then uses built-in AI analysis to deliver summaries, themes, and curated quotes—no spreadsheet, no copy-paste.
Deeper insights: Specific’s AI survey response analysis lets you chat with AI about your data, filter by any answer or attribute, and maintain context. You get features like follow-up breakdowns for every core question or NPS group. If you want more detail about how this works, check out the AI survey response analysis feature overview.
Key upside: With Specific, high-quality, AI-powered survey analysis isn’t a complex workflow. Just launch your survey for conference participants about virtual platform usability, then have all the heavy lifting done by the GPT-based engine.
And as a bonus, AI-powered surveys like those on Specific have much higher completion rates: up to 70-90%, compared to 10-30% for traditional forms, according to recent research. [1] [4]
Useful prompts that you can use for analyzing Conference Participants' virtual platform usability survey data
Let’s talk about how to squeeze real insights out of your conference participants' survey responses with AI. Whether you’re using ChatGPT or Specific, it all starts with good prompts.
Prompt for core ideas (universal winner): Use this exact prompt to get a concise, structured theme summary—the same approach Specific takes under the hood. Just paste your data and this prompt:
Your task is to extract core ideas in bold (4-5 words per core idea) + up to 2 sentence long explainer.
Output requirements:
- Avoid unnecessary details
- Specify how many people mentioned specific core idea (use numbers, not words), most mentioned on top
- no suggestions
- no indications
Example output:
1. **Core idea text:** explainer text
2. **Core idea text:** explainer text
3. **Core idea text:** explainer text
AI analysis always improves if you give it specific context about your survey goals, the situation, or the event itself. Here’s how you might do that:
This data comes from a survey of conference participants about their experiences using a virtual event platform. Our goal is to highlight areas of friction, technical issues, and opportunities for improving virtual engagement. Provide your summary in that context.
Dive deeper on themes: After extracting the initial themes, ask:
Tell me more about "technical challenges".
Prompt for specific topic: If you want to quickly check whether a certain issue came up, this one's gold:
Did anyone talk about "virtual meeting fatigue"? Include quotes.
Prompt for personas: Ask AI to cluster participants by type:
Based on these responses, identify and describe a list of distinct personas—similar to how "personas" are used in product management. For each persona, summarize their key characteristics, motivations, goals, and any quotes or patterns observed in the conversations.
Prompt for pain points and challenges:
Analyze all responses and list the most common pain points and challenges mentioned by participants regarding virtual platform usability. Summarize each, noting any patterns or frequencies.
Prompt for sentiment analysis:
Assess the overall sentiment expressed in the survey responses (e.g., positive, negative, neutral). Highlight key phrases or feedback that contribute to each sentiment category.
Prompt for unmet needs and opportunities:
Examine the survey to uncover any unmet needs, gaps, or opportunities for improving the virtual conference experience.
Want more guidance on choosing great survey questions for conference participants? There’s a helpful breakdown from Specific’s experts.
How Specific analyzes answers by question type
One major advantage of using a dedicated platform like Specific is the way it handles each question (and follow-up) type. Here’s what happens automatically:
Open-ended questions (with or without followups): The AI generates a summary of all responses to the main question, plus a composite summary of any follow-up conversations related to it.
Choices with followups: Each answer option gets its own breakdown—so if you ask, “Which virtual event tool did you use?” and then “What did you like/dislike about it?” every tool gets its own qualitative analysis.
NPS (Net Promoter Score): The AI summarizes all feedback (open and follow-up answers) separately for detractors, passives, and promoters. This is gold if you want to know how each group perceives your virtual platform’s usability.
You can do something similar manually in ChatGPT, but it’s a lot more labor-intensive and easy to lose track.
If you’re building out your survey, Specific offers an easy survey generator for conference participants on virtual platform usability—with all the best-practice logic in one click.
How to overcome AI context limits for large surveys
AI models (like GPT-4) have a context window—a hard cap on how much data you can send at once. For conference surveys with a few dozen responses, you’re fine. But if you have hundreds of replies, you’ll hit the wall fast. Specific solves this out of the box in two ways:
Filtering: Before sending data to the AI, filter conversations based on answers—for example, only analyze those mentioning technical problems, or filter by a specific participant segment. This way, the AI only analyzes the parts you care about. It’s practical for questions like “How did technical barriers impact engagement?”
Cropping: You can also crop to just the question(s) that matter most. Instead of the full conversation history, send only targeted question/answer pairs to the model. This helps you analyze more responses without running into technical constraints.
These approaches let you handle even larger batches of qualitative survey data without manual splitting or tons of cut-and-paste.
Collaborative features for analyzing conference participants survey responses
Analyzing survey responses about virtual platform usability often turns into messy back-and-forth between researchers, event organizers, and product teams. It’s easy to lose context or duplicate work.
Work in one place, together: With Specific, you can just chat with the AI about the responses. Collaborators can work in real time or asynchronously, share their findings, and avoid repeating the same analysis steps.
Multiple chats for multiple lenses: Need to explore technical pain points, as well as positive engagement? Just open different “chats.” Each can have its own set of filters (e.g., only responses from promoters, or only comments about technical difficulties), and displays who started the thread—so work is transparent and focused.
See who said what: In collaborative AI chat, each message is attributed—making follow-up easy. See what your teammates are asking, share links to a specific chat session, and keep everyone on the same page when evaluating usability data or debating where to focus improvement efforts.
No more siloed files: Everything stays structured and easy to find, so no more lost Excel attachments or redundant exports.
If you haven’t tried it, the AI survey analysis chat experience is worth a look.
Create your Conference Participants survey about Virtual Platform Usability now
Act fast and capture the full picture with conversational surveys that yield higher completion rates, deeper insights, and effortless analysis. Build smarter, ask better, and put insights in every team member’s hands in minutes.