This article will give you tips on how to analyze responses from a SaaS customer survey about customer effort score (CES). If you want actionable guidance on AI-powered survey analysis, you’re in the right place.
Choosing the right tools for survey response analysis
The approach and tools you’ll use depend on the form and structure of your survey data. Some insights are straightforward to extract, while others require more advanced AI tooling:
Quantitative data: Numbers are your friend here. If your survey asks “How much effort did it take to solve your issue?” and provides a finite set of responses, counting up the totals is dead simple in Excel or Google Sheets. A quick pivot table and you’re done.
Qualitative data: Things get complex fast with open-ended responses or follow-up questions. Reading every response yourself isn’t feasible when running at SaaS scale. Here’s where AI steps in to handle the heavy lifting—helping you spot key themes, sentiment, and actionable opportunities from free text answers.
There are two approaches for tooling when dealing with qualitative responses:
ChatGPT or similar GPT tool for AI analysis
Manual but flexible. You can export your open text survey data, paste it into ChatGPT, and converse with the AI about the core findings. This gives you raw GPT power but is not the most convenient experience:
Workflow friction: You’ll need to format and batch your responses, which takes time.
Context limits: GPT models accept only so much text at once—large datasets quickly hit the ceiling, so you’ll often end up chunking and repeating yourself.
Limited filtering: If you want to drill into specific answers (e.g., feedback from only detractors or those who selected a specific option), it’s manual work.
While AI-powered sentiment analysis is becoming more common in SaaS feedback workflows, traditional tools like ChatGPT require extra steps and discipline to get robust, repeatable analysis [4].
All-in-one tool like Specific
All-in-one, built for SaaS survey analysis. Specific is designed exactly for this. It lets you both collect survey responses in a conversational format and then instantly analyze them with built-in AI.
Conversational surveys boosted by follow-up questions. The AI doesn’t just record responses but asks smart follow-ups, so you get detailed, high-quality data instead of generic answers. See how AI-powered follow-up questions can improve your survey quality.
No manual exporting or formatting needed: Once data is in, AI runs analysis for you—summarizing themes, mapping core ideas, and even surfacing actionable suggestions. You can then chat directly with AI about the results, much like you would in ChatGPT, but with context fully managed.
Custom filters, easy data management: Want to view only responses mentioning high effort, or segment by user type? It’s point-and-click, not a spreadsheet chore.
Faster, more reliable: Cloud-based AI tools like Specific can analyze open-ended survey data up to 10 times faster than manual human methods [5].
Both paths have their own benefits, but for high-volume SaaS customer surveys about CES, all-in-one tools save you hours and deeply improve your understanding of user effort.
Useful prompts that you can use to analyze SaaS Customer survey data about customer effort score (CES)
Effective AI prompts help you get to the heart of your data fast. Here’s how I guide GPT (or use Specific’s built-in features) to unlock real value from the raw survey responses.
Prompt for core ideas: This is my go-to prompt for surfacing main themes across a big dataset. It prioritizes what’s mentioned most and ignores low-signal noise:
Your task is to extract core ideas in bold (4-5 words per core idea) + up to 2 sentence long explainer.
Output requirements:
- Avoid unnecessary details
- Specify how many people mentioned specific core idea (use numbers, not words), most mentioned on top
- no suggestions
- no indications
Example output:
1. **Core idea text:** explainer text
2. **Core idea text:** explainer text
3. **Core idea text:** explainer text
Tip: AI performs better if you give it as much context as possible. For example, tell it your survey’s purpose and your goal:
The following survey responses are from SaaS customers sharing their experiences about how much effort it took to get an issue resolved. Our goal is to understand drivers of high effort and to improve service processes. Please identify key pain points.
You can also dig deeper with follow-ups, like:
Tell me more about delayed support response (core idea)
Or validate specific themes:
Did anyone talk about account setup being confusing? Include quotes.
Prompt for pain points and challenges:
Analyze the survey responses and list the most common pain points, frustrations, or challenges mentioned. Summarize each, and note any patterns or frequency of occurrence.
Prompt for personas:
Based on the survey responses, identify and describe a list of distinct personas—similar to how "personas" are used in product management. For each persona, summarize their key characteristics, motivations, goals, and any relevant quotes or patterns observed in the conversations.
Prompt for motivations & drivers:
From the survey conversations, extract the primary motivations, desires, or reasons participants express for their behaviors or choices. Group similar motivations together and provide supporting evidence from the data.
Prompt for sentiment analysis:
Assess the overall sentiment expressed in the survey responses (e.g., positive, negative, neutral). Highlight key phrases or feedback that contribute to each sentiment category.
Prompt for suggestions & ideas:
Identify and list all suggestions, ideas, or requests provided by survey participants. Organize them by topic or frequency, and include direct quotes where relevant.
Qualitative prompts like these unlock much richer insights and help you get to the “why” behind your CES numbers. For more inspiration on survey design and analysis, see best questions for SaaS customer survey about CES.
How Specific analyzes qualitative survey data by question type
Not every survey question is created equal—each type needs a slightly different analysis approach, especially for customer effort score (CES) surveys where follow-up details often reveal make-or-break friction points.
Open-ended questions (with or without follow-ups): Specific automatically delivers a summary for all responses, grouped with related follow-up answers. If you ask “What made this experience easy or hard?”, you get a concise digest that includes both the initial feedback and AI-probed details.
Choices with follow-ups: For single- or multi-select options followed by a “Why?”, each choice gets its own summary. You can easily compare, for example, what made “billing” high effort versus “technical support”.
NPS-style questions: Responses are grouped as detractors, passives, and promoters. Each group’s related comments are summarized separately, so you can see what’s driving negative, neutral, or positive effort experiences.
If you’re tackling analysis in ChatGPT, you’ll need to segment responses manually, copy-paste filtered data, and run your prompts for each segment—not impossible, but a lot more work. Specific automates these steps so you can focus on acting on insights rather than wrangling spreadsheets. See the AI survey response analysis feature for details.
How to tackle context limit challenges with AI survey analysis
Working with AIs like GPT has its own challenge—context size limits. Large SaaS customer CES surveys can easily exceed the amount of text the AI can process at once. You need a strategy, and Specific solves this natively:
Filtering: Only send relevant conversations into the AI context. You can filter by who replied to specific questions or chose specific answers. This means the AI focuses solely on high effort cases, for example.
Cropping: Select just the questions you care about. Want only open-ended answers and not demographics? Crop the data before feeding to AI so the context limit isn’t wasted on noise.
If you’re exporting out and using GPT directly, try batching data in relevant chunks, or use filtering in spreadsheets before feeding the AI to keep your queries manageable.
The ability to rapidly analyze even large-scale, open-ended feedback is why AI-driven platforms are transforming SaaS survey analysis [5][4].
Collaborative features for analyzing SaaS customer survey responses
Ever faced a situation where multiple team members want to analyze CES survey results, filter by different criteria, or share findings, but everyone ends up with a different spreadsheet version? Collaborative features are essential to streamline insights across product, support, and CX teams.
Chat with AI as a team: In Specific, anyone on your team can analyze survey data simply by chatting with AI, right in the dashboard. No need to wait your turn, no export-import headaches.
Multiple chats for multiple angles: Each chat can have its own filters (such as “show only high effort cases”), and displays who started each thread. It’s easy for each department—support, product, execs—to have their own analyses, all side-by-side.
See who said what: When collaborating in AI Chat, you always know who made which comment or query—the sender’s avatar is visible, reducing confusion and boosting accountability.
Share, revisit, refine: Save any conversation, let colleagues add their own follow-ups, and revisit prior chats as the context (or goals) shift. It’s research collaboration made effortless.
Collaborative AI-powered survey analysis means your SaaS team can act fast, align on priorities, and put feedback into action. For more on survey creation and collaboration, read how to create a SaaS customer survey about customer effort.
Create your SaaS customer survey about customer effort score (CES) now
Get started and create your SaaS customer CES survey—collect deeper insights, analyze responses instantly, and put feedback into action before your competitors do.