This article will give you tips on how to analyze responses from a live demo attendee survey about expectations using AI and proven approaches for survey response analysis. If you want actionable insights, you’re in the right place.
Choosing the right tools for analyzing your survey responses
The right approach—and the tools you use—depends on the type and structure of your live demo attendee survey results.
Quantitative data: If your survey features closed-ended questions (like “rate from 1–5” or simple multiple choices), you can count and chart results fast using Excel, Google Sheets, or built-in survey dashboards. These tools make numeric summaries almost effortless.
Qualitative data: When you’re dealing with open-ended responses or in-depth follow-ups, reading everything by hand is painful and unpredictable. Manual analysis gets exhausting—especially if you want more than a superficial scan. AI tools make a huge difference here, speeding up discovery and letting you reach real understanding.
There are two approaches for tooling when dealing with qualitative responses:
ChatGPT or similar GPT tool for AI analysis
Copy-paste analysis: One way is to export your survey responses and paste them into ChatGPT (or another AI chatbot). You can then prompt the tool with questions or analysis tasks. It works, but in reality, it’s far from smooth—even tiny data sets can be challenging to format, and things get chaotic if you tweak your survey structure.
Limitations: You will encounter context limits (AI can only “see” so much text at once), and there’s a lack of built-in features to help organize, filter, or tag responses by question or attendee group. If you’re patient, you can spot patterns, but it’s rarely as efficient as you need.
All-in-one tool like Specific
Builtin AI-driven workflow: Purpose-built platforms such as Specific let you both create the survey and instantly analyze the results—an unbeatable combo for live demo events. They automatically ask intelligent follow-up questions during data collection, which dramatically increases the quality and context of each response (more on that in this explainer).
Highlights and summaries—no spreadsheets needed: After the event, Specific uses AI to immediately summarize feedback, flag the biggest themes, surface actionable insights, and let you have a chat (just like ChatGPT) to answer questions about your audience. You get extra tools for managing what gets sent to the AI, and responses from your attendees are already linked to the right question and context.
Choosing the right tool matters. AI-powered analysis can analyze large volumes of qualitative data up to 70% faster than manual techniques, so it’s a game changer if you want depth without delay. [1]
Useful prompts you can use to analyze Live Demo Attendee survey responses about expectations
You don’t have to be a prompt engineer to get powerful results. Try these prompts—whether you’re using Specific, ChatGPT, or another large language model.
Prompt for core ideas: This prompt extracts top themes and turns messy feedback into a bulletproof summary. It’s the backbone of Specific’s own analysis flow:
Your task is to extract core ideas in bold (4-5 words per core idea) + up to 2 sentence long explainer.
Output requirements:
- Avoid unnecessary details
- Specify how many people mentioned specific core idea (use numbers, not words), most mentioned on top
- no suggestions
- no indications
Example output:
1. **Core idea text:** explainer text
2. **Core idea text:** explainer text
3. **Core idea text:** explainer text
Give more context for even better results: Always let AI know what your survey is about, the event, your goals, or key audience facts. For example:
You are an analyst reviewing feedback from a live demo about a B2B SaaS tool. The audience consists of product managers and engineers. We want to understand expectations around hands-on usage, integrations, and support.
Dig deeper into a theme: After you find a core idea (say: “concern about onboarding time”), you might ask:
Tell me more about onboarding time concerns
Prompt for specific topic: Sometimes you want to check if attendees mentioned a certain topic. Use:
Did anyone talk about [feature X]? Include quotes.
Prompt for personas: If you want to understand your audience segments, use:
Based on the survey responses, identify and describe a list of distinct personas—similar to how "personas" are used in product management. For each persona, summarize their key characteristics, motivations, goals, and any relevant quotes or patterns observed in the conversations.
Prompt for pain points and challenges: To surface attendees’ struggles and blockers, use:
Analyze the survey responses and list the most common pain points, frustrations, or challenges mentioned. Summarize each, and note any patterns or frequency of occurrence.
Prompt for sentiment analysis: If you need to report the emotional tone, ask the AI:
Assess the overall sentiment expressed in the survey responses (e.g., positive, negative, neutral). Highlight key phrases or feedback that contribute to each sentiment category.
You can keep going—mix and match these prompts based on what you want to know. For more prompt ideas and best practices for this audience and topic, check the best questions for live demo attendee survey about expectations and get inspired.
How Specific analyzes qualitative data based on question types
Specific handles different question types in a way that makes analysis clearer and more actionable for live demo use cases:
Open-ended questions (with or without follow-ups): The AI groups all related responses together and produces one clear summary for the main question, plus for any follow-up topics.
Multiple choice questions with follow-ups: Each option gets its own summary of what users said in related follow-ups. You instantly see why someone picked a specific expectation or attended your demo.
NPS questions: The tool splits analysis by detractors, passives, and promoters. Each group’s feedback (including their reasons and follow-ups) is summarized separately, so you can prioritize what actually matters to different segments.
You can technically do all of this in ChatGPT (or NVivo, MAXQDA, QDA Miner, etc. [2][3][4]), but it’s much more labor-intensive—lots of copying, filtering, and manual mapping. Purpose-built AI survey analysis is way faster and lets you focus on acting, not just sifting through data.
Staying within AI context limits: Filtering and cropping
Every AI tool—yep, even GPT or Bard—has a limit on how much survey data it can “see” at once. If your demo attendee survey returns hundreds of responses, you’ll hit these limits. Specific’s approach solves this out of the box:
Filtering: Instead of analyzing all conversations, you can filter responses based on criteria (like only people who answered a particular question or selected a certain option). AI will analyze only the filtered set—saving context space for what matters most.
Cropping: If you only care about a handful of key questions, you can crop out the rest before sending to AI. This lets you focus analysis on top-priority expectations or challenges, while comfortably fitting within context size.
This makes it possible to run rich, detailed analysis without sacrificing completeness—or losing important feedback simply because your data set is too big. AI-powered tools process and summarize these large volumes of unstructured data up to 70% faster than manual methods, and can achieve sentiment classification accuracy of up to 90% in survey contexts. [1]
Collaborative features for analyzing live demo attendee survey responses
Collaborative analysis is hard. In reality, most teams struggle when multiple people try to review, tag, or discuss attendee expectations in a consistent way—especially if they’re passing around spreadsheets or raw exports.
In Specific, collaboration is conversational. Anyone on your team can spin up their own chat with the AI analyst, dig into a hypothesis, test new filters, or highlight a quote. You’re never limited to a single “analysis session”—each chat saves its context and filters, so you don’t step on each other’s toes.
Multiple chats, multiple points of view. Every chat thread is labeled with its creator’s avatar and filter settings. See who asked which questions, and track discoveries across your whole team. Sharing findings in context cuts down on miscommunication.
Know who’s talking. Inside the AI chat, sender avatars clarify who made which requests or discoveries. This keeps the process transparent, and makes it easy to trace thinking—from first question to final insight. With these features, collaboration isn’t just possible—it’s built in.
If you want guidance on creating your own event survey (including how to align your team), check out the how-to guide for live demo attendee surveys about expectations, or try the AI survey generator with ready-made prompts.
Create your live demo attendee survey about expectations now
Start collecting deeper, more actionable feedback in minutes with a conversational survey powered by AI. Get richer responses—plus instant, shareable analysis to turn attendee expectations into your event’s competitive edge.