This article will give you tips on how to analyze responses from an ex-cult member survey about social support networks using AI for deep, actionable insights.
Choosing the right tools for analysis
The approach and tooling you use to analyze ex-cult member survey data on social support networks completely depends on the nature and structure of your responses:
Quantitative data: Think multiple-choice, checkbox results, or NPS ratings. These numbers are easy to tally and visualize in tools like Excel or Google Sheets. You get quick trends, basic stats, and summary graphs without a headache.
Qualitative data: Open-ended answers (“Describe your support system after leaving the group,” or responses to AI-generated follow-up questions) are a different beast. Manually reading through dozens or hundreds of stories is overwhelming and prone to error. This is where AI-powered tools become essential for extracting real meaning and patterns from your survey. The good news? Modern AI is made exactly for this type of textual data, able to spot themes, summarize points of view, and highlight unique quotes effortlessly. According to leading sources, platforms like NVivo, ATLAS.ti, and MAXQDA now offer AI-assisted analysis features, allowing researchers to code, summarize, and analyze qualitative content in ways that used to demand weeks of manual effort. [1][2]
When you're dealing with qualitative responses, there are two approaches for tooling you should consider:
ChatGPT or similar GPT tool for AI analysis
You can copy and paste exported survey data into ChatGPT or a similar AI model, and then chat with the AI about your dataset. This can be eye-opening if you want fast thematic analysis, cluster identification, or just want to experiment with new perspectives.
The downside: Copy-pasting text is slow for many responses, and you might hit context window limits of the AI model. It also gets messy if you need to clean up exported formats or manage follow-up answers to branching survey logic.
All-in-one tool like Specific
Specific is purpose-built for this workflow: it collects conversational survey data directly from ex-cult members and analyzes it instantly using AI. Unlike generic models, it can:
Ask custom follow-up questions on the fly, raising the quality and depth of responses (see how automatic AI followups work).
Summarize all open-ended and branching answers, highlight recurring themes, surface outlier stories, and deliver bite-sized insights automatically.
Let you chat directly with AI about your results—ask, “What was the most mentioned support type?” or “Summarize why ex-cult members rated their networks poorly.” You can filter what you send to the AI, combine choice and open-ended data, and easily segment for different question types. Read more about this workflow on AI survey response analysis.
Whatever your approach, picking the right tool saves time and makes the work of understanding sensitive stories from ex-cult members more efficient and actionable. For context on getting started, check this guide on creating ex-cult member surveys.
Useful prompts you can use for analyzing ex-cult member social support network surveys
Quality AI survey analysis starts with strong prompts. Below are some that work especially well for ex-cult member surveys where social support network themes are nuanced and multilayered.
Prompt for core ideas: Use this for extracting the main topics and recurring themes from large datasets—especially powerful for open-ended answer analysis. This is the standard Specific uses under the hood, but it works great in any advanced GPT-based tool:
Your task is to extract core ideas in bold (4-5 words per core idea) + up to 2 sentence long explainer.
Output requirements:
- Avoid unnecessary details
- Specify how many people mentioned specific core idea (use numbers, not words), most mentioned on top
- no suggestions
- no indications
Example output:
1. **Core idea text:** explainer text
2. **Core idea text:** explainer text
3. **Core idea text:** explainer text
AI always performs better with more context about the survey, target group, and your analysis goals. For instance, add a framing primer like:
Analyze the survey responses from ex-cult members regarding their experiences with social support networks during reintegration. Identify common themes and challenges mentioned.
Once you get a list of core ideas or themes, you can probe deeper by asking:
Tell me more about [core idea/topic]
Prompt for specific topic: Straightforward and reliable for validation:
Did anyone talk about [topic]? Include quotes.
Prompt for pain points and challenges: Ask the AI to bubble up the biggest frustrations or recurring barriers respondents face (e.g., finding trustworthy support, rebuilding lost connections):
Analyze the survey responses and list the most common pain points, frustrations, or challenges mentioned. Summarize each, and note any patterns or frequency of occurrence.
Prompt for unmet needs and opportunities: This is great for identifying what’s missing from current support systems, or spotting new possibilities for programs and resources:
Examine the survey responses to uncover any unmet needs, gaps, or opportunities for improvement as highlighted by respondents.
Prompt for sentiment analysis: This surfaces overall tone—useful to segment survey results by positive, negative, or neutral sentiment, and track how people feel about their network:
Assess the overall sentiment expressed in the survey responses (e.g., positive, negative, neutral). Highlight key phrases or feedback that contribute to each sentiment category.
Mix and match these prompts in your analysis workflow for targeted, meaningful findings. If you want to see how these apply to the actual questions you ask, check out best questions for ex-cult member survey about social support networks.
How Specific analyzes qualitative data by question type
Specific tailors its AI analysis to the type of survey question you use:
Open-ended questions with or without follow-ups: You’ll get a summary for all main responses and all related follow-up answers, making it easy to see story clusters and key emotions.
Choices with follow-ups: Each choice (e.g., “family,” “online community,” “none”) has its own batch summary, along with all responses to associated follow-ups—super handy for seeing how people explain their selections.
NPS questions: Both the numerical rating data and qualitative follow-ups are split into summaries by category—detractors, passives, promoters. You can pinpoint exactly what sets each group apart. Find a ready-made survey for this in the NPS survey creator for ex-cult members.
You can run similar breakdowns using ChatGPT, but separating and filtering the data will take more manual effort, especially as responses scale.
Tackling challenges with AI context limit
AI models can only process so much data at once (the infamous “context window” problem). With a big enough set of ex-cult member responses, your analysis can hit limits. In Specific, this is solved with two simple approaches:
Filtering: You can quickly filter survey conversations so only those where respondents answered a certain question (or picked a specific choice) are sent to the AI. This lets you focus analysis on relevant stories and save your AI’s attention span.
Cropping: You can crop the data sent to the AI by selecting just the key questions. Analyzing only open-ended answers about “support after membership” or “network satisfaction” ensures your AI spends its brainpower on the most relevant content.
Both ensure you get high-quality insights from a large volume of qualitative data without running up against technical limitations. For more, see how Specific manages large-scale survey response analysis.
Collaborative features for analyzing ex-cult member survey responses
Collaboration can be tricky when analyzing responses to sensitive social support network surveys—especially across research or advocacy teams. Losing track of who’s asking what, mixing up threads, or drowning in exported spreadsheets is all too common.
Specific simplifies this process. You (and your team) can analyze the survey just by chatting with the analysis AI. You can set up multiple chat threads—each with different filters or focus areas—so one person examines social reintegration stories, and another dives into family support patterns.
Transparency and shared context are baked in. Every chat analysis thread shows who created it, so you don’t duplicate work or lose context. Within those chats, each message is attributed to the sender with their avatar, keeping collaboration smooth, fast, and user-friendly—especially important when handling complex experiences from ex-cult members. Everyone stays in sync, focuses their questions, and co-creates real value from the same dataset.
This teamwork-first approach streamlines cross-role analysis, improves insight sharing, and reduces bias in interpreting the experiences of your survey audience. For tips on setting up your survey and designing with collaboration in mind, try the AI survey generator for ex-cult member social support networks.
Create your ex-cult member survey about social support networks now
Start uncovering hidden patterns and actionable insights—generate and analyze your survey with instant AI-powered summaries, deep dives, and effortless collaboration in one workflow.