This article will give you tips on how to analyze responses from a College Doctoral Student survey about Teaching Assistant Experience. Whether you’re working with hundreds of open-ended replies or quantitative metrics, I’ll help you extract valuable insights with AI survey analysis tools.
Choosing the right tools for analysis
The tools and approach you use depend on your data’s structure and the format of survey responses. Let’s break it down:
Quantitative data: For structured questions—like “How satisfied are you, 1–10?” or multiple choice—the most efficient path is a spreadsheet. I often use Excel or Google Sheets to quickly tally results, calculate averages, and build basic graphs. Anyone can do this—it’s just counting and summarizing.
Qualitative data: Open-ended answers, follow-ups, or narrative responses are a different beast. You can’t comb through hundreds of essays by hand—and you shouldn’t. AI tools designed for natural language do the heavy lifting here, identifying key themes, trends, and opinions that would take a human team ages to unearth.
There are two approaches for tooling when dealing with qualitative responses:
ChatGPT or similar GPT tool for AI analysis
Cut-and-paste analysis: You can export your open-ended responses and paste them into ChatGPT (or another large language model) to explore patterns or ask custom questions. This lets you engage with your data conversationally—think of it as chatting with a research assistant who’s read all your answers.
Not so fast when data is large: Doing this for dozens of responses is fine. But as soon as you’re working with hundreds of responses, it gets clumsy. You might lose track, find it tedious to copy-paste, and grapple with organizing multiple follow-ups and different question types.
Summary: Great for small batches, hands-on experimentation, or when you already have your data exported. Still, managing the process on your own is cumbersome.
All-in-one tool like Specific
Purpose-built for survey analysis: Platforms like Specific are designed for analyzing qualitative survey feedback end-to-end. They let you collect and analyze responses within one system, powered by AI made for user feedback—not generic conversation.
Better data in, better insights out: Specific’s conversational format automatically probes with smart follow-up questions (see how AI followups work), so you get richer stories, not just short blurbs.
No spreadsheets, just answers: As soon as responses come in, you get instant AI summaries, actionable core themes, and the ability to “chat” with your results—ask the AI about suggestions, pain points, or even compare responses by cohort, all without manual sifting.
Analysis flows easily: You have extra tools to control which data gets sent to each AI conversation, manage context size, and keep separate analysis threads for different angles.
Interested in this approach? It’s worth checking the platform’s AI survey analysis page for more. You’ll avoid hours of manual review, and get deeper, more reliable insights into your College Doctoral Students’ teaching assistant experiences—backed by AI tailored for this exact workflow.
In fact, analyzing survey responses from college doctoral students about their teaching assistant experiences can reveal trends in challenges and the impact on academic development—something many universities have started to prioritize in their program reviews [1].
Useful prompts that you can use to analyze College Doctoral Student Teaching Assistant Experience survey responses
AI is only as good as the prompt you give it, especially when tackling messy, multi-layered feedback such as doctoral students’ experiences as teaching assistants. Here are proven prompts you can use right now—whether you’re working in Specific, ChatGPT, or another AI tool.
Prompt for core ideas:
Your task is to extract core ideas in bold (4-5 words per core idea) + up to 2 sentence long explainer.
Output requirements:
- Avoid unnecessary details
- Specify how many people mentioned specific core idea (use numbers, not words), most mentioned on top
- no suggestions
- no indications
Example output:
1. **Core idea text:** explainer text
2. **Core idea text:** explainer text
3. **Core idea text:** explainer text
Tip: Add context for better answers! AI always delivers more relevant results if you set the stage with the survey’s purpose, your audience, or your goals. For example:
Analyze the survey responses from college doctoral students regarding their teaching assistant experiences to identify common challenges and benefits.
Dive deeper into specific findings: Once you have core themes, use laser-focused prompts like:
Tell me more about workload management issues mentioned by doctoral students.
Prompt for specific topic: If you need to validate whether a challenge or opportunity (say, “support from supervisors”) came up, ask:
Did anyone talk about support from faculty? Include quotes.
Here are more targeted prompts, tested for surveys about doctoral student teaching assistant experience:
Prompt for personas:
Based on the survey responses, identify and describe a list of distinct personas—similar to how "personas" are used in product management. For each persona, summarize their key characteristics, motivations, goals, and any relevant quotes or patterns observed in the conversations.
Prompt for pain points and challenges:
Analyze the survey responses and list the most common pain points, frustrations, or challenges mentioned. Summarize each, and note any patterns or frequency of occurrence.
Prompt for Motivations & Drivers:
From the survey conversations, extract the primary motivations, desires, or reasons participants express for their behaviors or choices. Group similar motivations together and provide supporting evidence from the data.
Prompt for sentiment analysis:
Assess the overall sentiment expressed in the survey responses (e.g., positive, negative, neutral). Highlight key phrases or feedback that contribute to each sentiment category.
Prompt for suggestions & ideas:
Identify and list all suggestions, ideas, or requests provided by survey participants. Organize them by topic or frequency, and include direct quotes where relevant.
Prompt for unmet needs & opportunities:
Examine the survey responses to uncover any unmet needs, gaps, or opportunities for improvement as highlighted by respondents.
Don’t forget, using prompts like these helps you move from generic AI summaries to granular, actionable insights. For more prompt inspiration and survey design guidance, see our article on best survey questions for doctoral students and TAs.
Colleges that invest in analyzing open-ended feedback using these methods see higher quality improvement plans and more actionable insights [2].
How Specific analyzes qualitative survey data by question type
The type of question you ask in a survey shapes how responses are summarized and interpreted. In Specific, we lean into this by tailoring AI analysis to every question style:
Open-ended questions (with or without follow-ups): The AI gives you a summary for all responses, including separate summaries for in-depth follow-ups linked to those questions. If you ask “What are your biggest TA challenges?”, you’ll get a distilled list of pain points pulled from all comments and follow-up conversations.
Choices with follow-ups: Each answer option (say, “Time management”) receives its own custom summary, based on what respondents said when picking that option and answering follow-up probes. This allows you to compare feedback on specific issues—helping you pin down what’s working and what isn’t.
NPS questions: Responses are split by group: detractors, passives, or promoters. The AI provides a tailored summary for each group based on what people said about their choice (e.g., detractors explaining why they had a poor experience).
You could achieve similar outcomes by pasting batches of relevant responses into ChatGPT and running prompts for each segment, but it’s a lot more manual work and easy to lose track. I prefer tools that automate this mapping and summarization process.
Qualitative data, especially from doctoral student surveys, often highlights complex challenges and detailed stories that can’t be reduced to numbers alone [3]. Using AI to break down responses by structure and group is the shortcut to actionable insight.
Overcoming AI context limits in survey analysis
If you try to stuff all your survey responses into a single AI prompt, you might hit a wall: large language models can only “see” a certain amount of data at once (their “context size”). Here’s how I work around that:
Filtering: Before analysis, I filter conversations so only relevant responses—say, those who answered “yes” to a key question or mentioned workload—get sent to the AI. This puts the spotlight on the most interesting conversations, and keeps you under the AI’s data size limit.
Cropping: Sometimes, I crop to just the questions that matter for my analysis—like only the open-ended ones, or responses to a specific follow-up. This focused scope means I can include more distinct conversations in a single AI run, while ignoring noise.
Specific handles these context management tactics out of the box, so you don’t need to juggle your own data filters or manually prune datasets before pasting them into analysis tools.
With the right filtering and cropping, you get more value from your AI—and can explore hundreds of College Doctoral Student responses without running into technical limits.
Collaborative features for analyzing College Doctoral Student survey responses
On a big survey project—like understanding TA experience across multiple cohorts—collaborating on analysis is often a major headache. Usually, people share spreadsheets, copy-paste responses, or lose track of who said what in giant group chats.
Team chat with AI: In Specific, you and your colleagues can each start your own AI chats to explore the survey from different angles: maybe you’re focused on workload, someone else is delving into training needs. Each chat keeps its own view and filters so you don’t overwrite each other’s work.
See who asked what: With multiple chats in play, Specific labels each conversation by author and group. When working in AI Chat with others, each message includes the sender’s avatar, so everyone knows who’s contributing—and you avoid confusion or double analysis.
Review and compare findings: Each chat acts as a living “analysis thread,” letting each collaborator keep notes, run prompts, or summarize outputs in their own way. It’s easy to pull together final reports or compare takeaways across the team.
This is a huge upgrade over the traditional approach of one shared document—especially when your College Doctoral Student TA experience survey needs input from researchers, program admins, or grad student representatives at the same time.
Create your College Doctoral Student survey about Teaching Assistant Experience now
Start collecting rich, actionable feedback with AI-driven surveys—get better answers, analyze everything instantly, and uncover insights you’d miss with forms or spreadsheets.