This article will give you tips on how to analyze responses from a College Doctoral Student survey about Diversity And Inclusion Climate. If you’re looking for practical ways to turn survey analysis into actionable insights, you’re in the right place.
Choosing the right tools for survey response analysis
The way you analyze your College Doctoral Student survey data on diversity and inclusion climate depends on the structure of your responses. Both the tools you pick and your approach matter.
Quantitative data: If you’re looking at straightforward numbers—how many doctoral students answered “yes,” for example, or the distribution of demographic data—classic tools like Excel or Google Sheets can help you see trends and create simple charts. These work best for responses that break down into neat, countable categories.
Qualitative data: If you ask open-ended questions like “How do you feel about your department’s climate?” or include follow-up questions, old-school analysis won’t get you far. You’ll need AI tools to efficiently process and surface insights from this messy, text-heavy data.
There are two approaches for tooling when dealing with qualitative responses:
ChatGPT or similar GPT tool for AI analysis
You can export your responses and paste them into ChatGPT or another GPT tool. This lets you chat directly with AI about your survey data and extract patterns or summaries. But, the process is often tedious: copying and pasting big sets of responses, breaking them into chunks to avoid chat limits, and tracking questions between prompts forces you into a copy-paste loop.
Privacy and workflow concerns. You’ll need to be mindful of sensitive data, and it’s easy to lose context or miss out on full-data insights if you split things up across different conversations.
All-in-one tool like Specific
Specific is built specifically for conversational surveys and AI-powered analysis. The tool both collects data and analyzes responses in one system. It stands out by asking live follow-up questions, which makes your College Doctoral Student survey results much richer and more actionable—these dynamic follow-ups are key in capturing student context, motivations, and feelings, especially on diversity and inclusion issues.
AI-powered analysis is integrated and instant. The platform summarizes and categorizes responses automatically, surfaces key trends, and lets you chat with the AI about your results—just like ChatGPT, but purpose-built for survey data. You have more granular control and can filter, segment, or deep dive into data as you wish. Read more about how this works in AI survey response analysis features.
Purpose-built features for survey analysis. Specific automatically manages data context, so the limitations you encounter in manual GPT chats are less of an issue. Plus, you can set filters, chat about segments, and the platform ensures privacy and security for sensitive academic data.
It's worth mentioning that organizations like Divrsity and TigerGPT have built similar adaptive survey platforms or AI chatbots for climate surveys, successfully engaging large cohorts (such as doctoral students) and surfacing more actionable feedback than static survey forms ever could. [4][5]
Useful prompts that you can use for College Doctoral Student diversity and inclusion survey analysis
To get the most out of your survey data, you should use smart prompts designed for extracting insights from qualitative feedback. AI tools perform much better when given clear instructions and extra context about the survey and your goals.
Prompt for core ideas: Use this to quickly distill topics from large data sets. Specific uses this as its default and you’ll get great results with it in other GPTs too:
Your task is to extract core ideas in bold (4-5 words per core idea) + up to 2 sentence long explainer.
Output requirements:
- Avoid unnecessary details
- Specify how many people mentioned specific core idea (use numbers, not words), most mentioned on top
- no suggestions
- no indications
Example output:
1. **Core idea text:** explainer text
2. **Core idea text:** explainer text
3. **Core idea text:** explainer text
Strong prompts work even better if you add more background. Example:
Analyze the survey responses from College Doctoral Students about the climate of diversity and inclusion in their department. Our goal is to identify areas of concern and actionable improvement. Responses include both open-ended and follow-up responses. Summarize core issues and mention any significant patterns related to gender or ethnicity if present.
Try also: Tell me more about XYZ (core idea) — ask AI to expand a summary or key point to get more detail.
Prompt for specific topic: If you want to see if a topic, like inequities in departmental funding or mentorship opportunities, was raised:
Did anyone talk about funding disparities for underrepresented students? Include quotes.
Prompt for pain points and challenges: If you want a list of common issues or frustrations that emerge in the climate:
Analyze the survey responses and list the most common pain points, frustrations, or challenges mentioned by doctoral students regarding diversity and inclusion in their program. Summarize each, and note any patterns or frequency of occurrence.
Prompt for personas: Curious if there are “types” of student experiences?
Based on the survey responses, identify and describe a list of distinct personas—similar to how "personas" are used in product management. For each persona, summarize their key characteristics, motivations, goals, and any relevant quotes or patterns observed in the conversations.
Prompt for sentiment analysis: Want to know how students feel overall?
Assess the overall sentiment expressed in the survey responses (e.g., positive, negative, neutral). Highlight key phrases or feedback that contribute to each sentiment category.
You can find more prompt examples and best practices for this exact audience and topic in this guide to best questions for college doctoral student diversity and inclusion surveys.
How Specific analyzes qualitative data based on question type
The type of survey question you use shapes how you should analyze the data, and Specific has tailored its approach accordingly:
Open-ended questions with or without followups: The AI summarizes the overarching themes and patterns across all responses—including any follow-up discussion initiated by the AI itself. This is key for surfacing nuanced insights where students expand on topics like sense of belonging or perceived barriers.
Multiple choices with followups: Each answer choice gets its own drilled-down summary of the related follow-up responses. For a question like “Have you experienced discrimination?” with followup, you’ll see segmented summaries tied to each scenario students selected.
NPS (Net Promoter Score): Each group—detractors, passives, and promoters—gets a summary of all follow-up commentary related to their score. It makes it easy to compare dissatisfaction drivers with factors students see as positive or neutral.
You could achieve a similar end using ChatGPT plus manual sorting, but it’s labor-intensive and easy to misplace question-level context.
You can learn more about this in our guide to AI survey response analysis and see how Specific leverages automatic AI followup questions to transform survey quality: how AI followup works.
How to tackle challenges with AI’s context limits
One of the trickier hurdles is context size—AIs like GPT only “see” a certain amount of data at once. If your survey has hundreds of responses, the whole set might not fit into context, which means you risk incomplete analysis.
Filtering: Focus the AI’s analysis by including only conversations or responses where users replied to certain questions or picked particular answers. This way, the AI analyzes the most relevant subset, staying inside context size limits.
Cropping: Limit the questions sent to the AI—analyze just part of your survey at a time, which dramatically increases the number of full conversations AI can consider in a session.
Specific handles both these approaches out of the box, which saves a serious amount of manual effort. If you’re using ChatGPT directly, you’ll need to plan out your batches or chunks before analysis and keep close tabs on what’s being sent in each prompt.
More on dealing with workflow and structure? Check our how-to on creating doctoral student surveys.
Collaborative features for analyzing College Doctoral Student survey responses
Collaboration on survey analysis can be tough. Especially for diversity and inclusion climate surveys—there’s often a mix of research staff, department heads, and administrators working together. Keeping feedback flowing, segmenting findings, and separating perspectives is usually a juggling act.
In Specific, survey data analysis is conversational and collaborative. Team members can chat directly with AI in the app—no need to switch between tools. You can spin up multiple parallel chats for different lines of questioning: one focused on “mentorship gaps,” another filtering on responses from URM students, yet another on positive aspects surfaced by international respondents.
Each chat is its own context. You apply custom filters to every analysis chat, focusing on relevant segments, and see at a glance who started that analysis. This is a game-changer for group projects or committee work.
Avatar-based messages keep things clear. When collaborating, you see which team member said what in the analysis chat, bringing transparency and clarity—no more “who ran this?”
For more on creating and customizing these kinds of collaborative survey workspaces, head over to the AI survey editor feature page or start from scratch in our dedicated doctoral student survey generator.
Create your College Doctoral Student survey about diversity and inclusion climate now
Turn rich College Doctoral Student insights into actionable change by building your own AI-powered survey today—get automatic followups, deep-dive AI-driven analysis, and effortless collaboration all in one.