This article will give you tips on how to analyze responses from a clinical trial participants survey about communication with the study team. Let's look at practical, AI-powered ways to make sense of your feedback.
Choosing the right tools for analyzing survey responses
Your approach and the tools you choose will depend on the type and structure of the data you collect. Here’s how to think about it for a clinical trial participants survey:
Quantitative data: Numbers, counts, and rating scales (like "How satisfied were you?") are straightforward. You can analyze these quickly in spreadsheets such as Excel or Google Sheets. They let you see at a glance how many participants selected each option, spot trends, and calculate retention rates.
Qualitative data: When you have open-ended answers or people’s stories about their experiences with the study team, it’s a different ballgame. Reading hundreds of text responses on your own is slow and error-prone. This is where AI tools become essential—they help you spot patterns, distill feedback, and drill down into what participants really need.
There are two broad approaches for tooling when you’re dealing with qualitative responses:
ChatGPT or similar GPT tool for AI analysis
One method is to export your qualitative data (all those free-text replies) and paste it into a large language model like ChatGPT. You can then “chat” about your data, asking questions and steering the analysis in real time.
Convenience: This method gives you flexibility—the ability to follow up, reframe your questions, and get iterative summaries. But in practice, it’s often pretty inconvenient. Large data sets can exceed the context window, so you’ll end up chunking your responses and doing extra copy-paste work. Managing data, keeping track of follow-up questions, and ensuring no feedback slips through the cracks can make things messy.
All-in-one tool like Specific
Specific is designed for exactly this use case. It lets you collect conversational survey data and automate the heavy lifting of qualitative analysis. When you build surveys with Specific, the conversation feels natural—participants respond as if chatting with a person, and dynamic follow-up questions are automatically generated for deeper insight, often leading to higher quality data.
Instant AI-powered analysis: After collecting responses, Specific summarizes, highlights key themes, and delivers actionable insights—no spreadsheets or manual reading required. You can chat directly with the AI about your results, just like with ChatGPT, but you also get tools to manage the data context sent to AI, slice responses by filters, and keep everything organized.
If you’re interested, you’ll find more on this approach—including how the AI chat with survey results works—at AI survey response analysis.
Effective survey response analysis is a huge boost for engagement and retention in clinical trials. Research consistently shows that well-structured feedback loops—where participant voices are actively analyzed and used—lead to higher trial satisfaction and completion rates [1].
Useful prompts that you can use for survey data analysis about communication with study team
Let’s get practical. When I analyze qualitative survey data, I rely on prompts that guide the AI to extract exactly what I need. Here are some of the most effective ones for a clinical trial participants survey focused on communication:
Prompt for core ideas: This is my go-to prompt to pull out the main topics and themes—whether I’m using ChatGPT or an integrated tool like Specific.
Your task is to extract core ideas in bold (4-5 words per core idea) + up to 2 sentence long explainer.
Output requirements:
- Avoid unnecessary details
- Specify how many people mentioned specific core idea (use numbers, not words), most mentioned on top
- no suggestions
- no indications
Example output:
1. **Core idea text:** explainer text
2. **Core idea text:** explainer text
3. **Core idea text:** explainer text
Tip: AI always gives better and more useful results if you feed it context about your survey, its purpose, and what you hope to learn. For example:
Analyze the survey responses from clinical trial participants regarding their communication with the study team to identify key themes and areas for improvement.
Once you have your core ideas, you can dig even deeper. Try prompts like:
“Tell me more about XYZ (core idea)” to get a detailed breakdown, or “Did anyone talk about information clarity? Include quotes.” to confirm assumptions or discover supporting quotes straight from participants.
For this clinical trial context, there are a few more prompts that are especially useful:
Prompt for personas: Understand who your participants are and how they communicate. Try:
Based on the survey responses, identify and describe a list of distinct personas—similar to how "personas" are used in product management. For each persona, summarize their key characteristics, motivations, goals, and any relevant quotes or patterns observed in the conversations.
Prompt for pain points and challenges: Spot where communication is breaking down:
Analyze the survey responses and list the most common pain points, frustrations, or challenges mentioned in communicating with the study team. Summarize each, and note any patterns or frequency of occurrence.
Prompt for motivations and drivers: Uncover why people participate and what communication needs drive their satisfaction:
From the survey conversations, extract the primary motivations, desires, or reasons participants express for their behaviors or choices. Group similar motivations together and provide supporting evidence from the data.
Prompt for sentiment analysis: Get a feel for how participants view their interactions with the study team:
Assess the overall sentiment expressed in the survey responses (e.g., positive, negative, neutral) about communication with the study team. Highlight key phrases or feedback that contribute to each sentiment category.
Prompt for suggestions and ideas: Surface actionable suggestions you might have missed:
Identify and list all suggestions, ideas, or requests provided by survey participants for improving communication with the study team. Organize them by topic or frequency, and include direct quotes where relevant.
Prompt for unmet needs and opportunities: Spot gaps or chances for major improvements:
Examine the survey responses to uncover any unmet needs, gaps, or opportunities for improvement as highlighted by respondents.
For more guidance on what to ask, check out best questions for clinical trial participants surveys about team communication.
How Specific analyzes qualitative data by question type
When I’m working with feedback, I care a lot about how the analysis engine breaks down results question by question. Here’s how Specific handles this—so you get the clearest, most actionable takeaways from your qualitative data:
Open-ended questions (with or without follow-ups):
For each open-ended question, Specific generates a concise summary for all responses—plus any related follow-ups. You see not just the top-level answers, but the detail behind why participants said what they did.
Choice questions with follow-ups:
If your survey includes choices (“Select all that apply”) and asks for explanations, you get a separate summary for the follow-up responses tied to each choice. This helps clarify why each option was picked.
NPS (Net Promoter Score):
For NPS-type questions, you get individual breakdowns for detractors, passives, and promoters. You can analyze the nuances behind why each group feels the way they do.
You can definitely do similar analysis in ChatGPT—it just takes more effort to keep everything lined up for each question. With Specific, these breakdowns are automatic and save a ton of time. If you want to try building a clinical trial communication survey with smart AI follow-ups, see how easy it is in this ready-made survey generator.
How to manage AI context size limits with large sets of clinical trial feedback
AI tools—including ChatGPT—have a maximum “context size”: if you dump too much data into a single prompt, the model can lose track, or worse, cut off important narratives. This is a real concern with large clinical trial surveys. Here’s how Specific (and some careful manual steps in other tools) lets you stay in control:
Filtering: You can filter conversations to include only replies to selected questions, or only see responses from those who picked a specific option. The AI then analyzes just those threads, so you avoid overload and hone in on what matters.
Cropping: You can crop questions and send only a subset to the AI. This tactic works especially well if you want deep insight on just a few areas, and need to process more responses without breaking context limits.
These built-in features make large-scale qualitative analysis feasible and efficient, so you’re not bogged down by technical limits or forced to split your data manually. Learn more about the approach in our guide to AI survey response analysis.
Collaborative features for analyzing clinical trial participants survey responses
Collaborating on response analysis is always tricky—maybe you’re splitting results by location, or one person is pulling out pain points while another looks for personas. Coordinating across teams isn’t easy, especially for clinical trial participants feedback about communication with the study team.
Easy collaboration with AI chat: In Specific, you can analyze data just by chatting with the AI. What makes this even more powerful is the ability to spin up multiple chats, each focused on a different angle or filtered set of responses. Every chat displays who created it, so there’s never confusion about who’s leading each analysis.
Real-time visibility into teamwork: As you and your colleagues chat with the AI, each message is clearly labeled with the sender’s avatar—so you always know who said what, and can follow up or revisit insights fast.
Streamlined sharing: With these features, the whole process of analyzing survey responses becomes genuinely collaborative—and tailored to clinical research teams that need to trust, track, and expand on each other’s findings.
Want to see what it’s like in action? Try building your own survey in the AI survey generator, or explore how to create a clinical trial communication survey step by step.
Create your clinical trial participants survey about communication with study team now
Get richer clinical trial feedback with AI-powered surveys that make analysis simple, collaborative, and actionable—generate meaningful insights for your research in minutes.