This article will give you tips on how to analyze responses from a citizen survey about air quality concerns using AI and modern survey analysis tools. I'll walk you through choosing the right tools, prompts, and practical workflows to get actionable insights from your data.
Choosing the right tools for survey analysis
The approach—and the best tools—depends on the structure of your survey’s data. Here’s a quick breakdown to help you set your analysis up for success:
Quantitative data: If your survey collected things like rankings, star ratings, or multiple-choice answers (“How concerned are you with local air quality?”), you can quickly tally responses, calculate percentages, and visualize trends using Excel, Google Sheets, or even basic survey platforms’ built-in exports.
Qualitative data: Open-ended questions (“What worries you most about air pollution?”) or text-fueled follow-ups are a different beast. Manually reading hundreds of responses is painful, if not impossible. This is why AI tools are now essential for making sense of these large volumes of written feedback. In fact, advanced AI tools like MAXQDA, Atlas.ti, and NVivo have started integrating GPT-powered features specifically for this need, speeding up coding and theme identification from qualitative surveys and interviews[1][2][3].
When dealing with qualitative survey responses, you basically have two tool strategies to choose from:
ChatGPT or similar GPT tool for AI analysis
If you want to quickly analyze qualitative data, you can copy your exported survey responses and paste them into ChatGPT or any similar GPT-style AI tool. It’s a solid option for light analysis, but the workflow is far from convenient—copy-pasting large blocks of text is clunky, and once you exceed context size limits, you’ll have to break things into chunks. Maintaining categories, follow-ups, and question logic is also tough by hand.
The main advantage: Free, widely accessible, and can handle plain text. However, it takes a lot of manual work to prepare data, handle context overflow, and interpret results.
All-in-one tool like Specific
Specific is an AI survey tool built especially for collecting and instantly analyzing qualitative feedback. Here’s what makes it stand out:
Data collection: Specific surveys can ask intelligent follow-up questions in real time, which increases not just the volume, but the depth and clarity of the data you’ll receive. Curious about how these AI follow-ups work? Check out the automatic follow-up feature for a closer look.
Instant analysis: As soon as responses come in, Specific’s built-in GPT context analyzes the data, summarizes opinions, pulls out key themes, and highlights what matters most—without you having to touch a spreadsheet.
Conversational analysis: You can chat with the AI about your results, much like ChatGPT, but tailored to your survey’s context. You also get smart features for filtering the data, segmenting by respondent group, and quickly managing what’s sent to AI for analysis.
Full workflow: Everything from survey creation to sharing and analysis lives in one place, making it much easier than bouncing between multiple platforms. Want to create a citizen survey about air quality concerns with a prompt-based builder? Try the survey generator preset or start from scratch with the AI survey generator.
AI-powered survey tools like Specific, and others such as Looppanel and Thematic, are changing the analysis process by blending machine learning with survey structure—some even enable collaborative review to validate what the AI finds[4][5].
Useful prompts that you can use for citizen air quality responses
The right AI prompt saves hours by narrowing the focus of the analysis. Here are several prompt templates you can use with an AI survey response analyzer like Specific, ChatGPT, or similar tools—and why they work well for citizen feedback on air quality:
Prompt for core ideas: This works brilliantly on big data sets, quickly revealing hot topics and how many people feel the same way. It’s the default prompt for summarizing themes in Specific. Just drop it in your AI conversation window:
Your task is to extract core ideas in bold (4-5 words per core idea) + up to 2 sentence long explainer.
Output requirements:
- Avoid unnecessary details
- Specify how many people mentioned specific core idea (use numbers, not words), most mentioned on top
- no suggestions
- no indications
Example output:
1. **Core idea text:** explainer text
2. **Core idea text:** explainer text
3. **Core idea text:** explainer text
Give AI extra context for better results. AI analysis always improves when you include background information: the survey’s purpose, what kind of citizens participated, if you have specific research goals, or even local events. Here’s an example of adding context to your core ideas prompt:
The following responses come from a recent citizen survey about air quality concerns in [your city]. Please focus on extracting the top concerns regarding health impacts and local policy suggestions.
From there, dig deeper by asking:
"Tell me more about [core idea]." Example: “Tell me more about health impacts from air pollution.” This fetches quotes, specifics, and nuances.
Prompt for specific topic: When you want to see if anyone brought up a concern like “smoke from wildfires,” just use:
Did anyone talk about smoke from wildfires? Include quotes.
You might want to identify different respondent groups:
Prompt for personas:
Based on the survey responses, identify and describe a list of distinct personas—similar to how "personas" are used in product management. For each persona, summarize their key characteristics, motivations, goals, and any relevant quotes or patterns observed in the conversations.
Prompt for pain points and challenges:
Analyze the survey responses and list the most common pain points, frustrations, or challenges mentioned. Summarize each, and note any patterns or frequency of occurrence.
Prompt for sentiment analysis:
Assess the overall sentiment expressed in the survey responses (e.g., positive, negative, neutral). Highlight key phrases or feedback that contribute to each sentiment category.
For more ideas on asking the right questions in these surveys, check Specific’s article on best questions for citizen survey about air quality concerns.
How Specific analyzes qualitative survey data by question type
Specific tailors its AI-powered analysis to the structure of each survey question, so you can surface precise insights in less time:
Open-ended questions (with or without follow-ups): Instantly generates a summary of all responses, combining the main response and anything collected via AI-powered follow-up questions. This helps reveal big-picture themes and the underlying reasons behind concerns.
Choices with follow-ups: For each answer choice, you get a separate summary just for related follow-up responses. Want to see what people who chose “Very concerned” say about the causes? It’s just one click.
NPS (Net Promoter Score): Automatically separates out feedback from promoters, passives, and detractors—each group gets a focused analysis based on their follow-up responses. This matters because motivations and frustrations can vary by segment.
You can achieve something similar using ChatGPT, but it’s far more labor intensive: you have to manually keep track of which responses go with which questions or score categories, increasing the likelihood of missing subtle themes or repeating work. Specific frameworks this for you and keeps everything clean and referenceable.
Dealing with AI context limits on big surveys
AI tools like ChatGPT, and even GPT-powered features in research software, have a context size limit—if your citizen survey has too many responses, not everything will fit into a single analysis session. Fortunately, there are effective ways to overcome this, both with Specific (which has built-in solutions) and with careful manual work elsewhere:
Filtering: Select only the conversations where users replied to a certain question or chose a particular answer; send only those to the AI for analysis. This trims the total input and keeps your context focused on what actually matters.
Cropping by question: Instead of analyzing entire conversations, isolate responses just to a specific question (and its follow-ups), making it much more likely your entire set will fit into the AI’s context window.
Specific simplifies this: you select a few filters or questions, and everything else is managed behind the scenes, letting you focus on insights instead of data prep. Other tools like NVivo or Looppanel require manual exports and data formatting, which can add lots of overhead if you have hundreds (or thousands) of voices to include[3][4].
For larger studies on citizen environmental attitudes, the right AI workflow can be a game changer—especially as only 17% of global cities meet air pollution guidelines[2], and data volumes are rising fast.
Collaborative features for analyzing citizen survey responses
Collaborating on the analysis of citizen air quality concerns surveys is often a challenge: when multiple team members add their insights, tracking who found what, which filters are in play, and what’s left to explore can get confusing. Here's how Specific makes collaboration simple:
Real-time AI Chat: Anyone can analyze survey data by chatting directly with the AI, removing bottlenecks caused by specialized tools or lone “research heroes.”
Multiple collaborative chats: You can spin up multiple analysis chats, each with its own set of filters or focus areas (like “concerns by neighborhood” or “feedback from parents”). Every chat displays who created it, making it much easier to coordinate what’s being worked on, and prevent duplicate efforts.
Transparent teamwork: As you and your colleagues contribute analysis, every message in the chat shows the sender’s avatar—so you always know who asked a question or made a note. It’s simple, but instantly clarifies attribution and speeds up decision making.
This kind of collaborative insight-building is especially useful for public sector research, where multiple departments or city leaders may each want different slices of the data. You can also read about using citizen surveys for these scenarios (with ready-built templates) in Specific’s article on how to easily create a citizen survey about air quality concerns.
If you ever want to tweak your survey questions as part of this collaborative loop, editing is a breeze—just chat with Specific’s survey editor and update the flow using plain language.
Create your citizen survey about air quality concerns now
Unlock deeper insights about air pollution by creating a citizen conversational survey in minutes—collect richer feedback, analyze responses instantly, and empower your team with actionable data, all in one place.