Here are some of the best questions for a conference participants survey about live stream quality, plus tips on how to craft them. If you want to build your own survey in seconds, Specific makes the whole process incredibly easy and smart.
Best open-ended questions for conference participants survey about live stream quality
Open-ended questions help us tap into an authentic perspective—participants can express real experiences instead of just picking from preset answers. Use these when you want to capture the "why" behind ratings, dig into nuanced frustrations, or explore unexpected insights that shape live stream experiences.
How would you describe the quality of the live stream during the conference?
What challenges, if any, did you encounter while watching the live stream?
Which aspects of the live stream stood out to you the most—either positively or negatively?
If you experienced buffering or lag, can you walk us through what happened and its impact on your experience?
What improvements would make the live stream experience better for you?
How did the audio and video quality compare to your expectations?
Were there any moments when you considered leaving the stream? If so, what prompted that feeling?
Tell us about any support or troubleshooting you needed during the live stream.
How did the live stream compare to similar online events or conference streams you’ve attended?
What’s the one thing we could do to deliver an outstanding live streaming experience next time?
Open-ended questions are vital, especially considering that 67% of viewers cite video quality as the most crucial factor while watching a live stream, and issues like buffering can cause viewers to abandon a stream in under 90 seconds. [2][4]
Best single-select multiple-choice questions for conference participants survey about live stream quality
Sometimes, you need structured data to spot trends and quantify pain points. Single-select multiple-choice questions are great for this. They let people respond quickly and can serve as a gateway to richer feedback when paired with targeted follow-ups. They're also less mentally taxing—if you want more conference participants to reply, make it easy for them.
Question: How would you rate the overall live stream quality?
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Question: What was the biggest issue you faced with the live stream?
Buffering/Lag
Low video quality
Audio problems
No major issues
Other
Question: How soon was your issue (if any) resolved?
Immediately
Within a few minutes
Within an hour
It wasn’t resolved
When to follow up with "why?" If someone rates the stream as "fair" or "poor," or mentions "buffering/lag," following up with "Why did you choose that response?" uncovers the specific pain points ("The video kept freezing every 10 minutes," for example). This context turns surface-level numbers into actionable insight.
When and why to add the "Other" choice? "Other" opens space for participants to share unique issues not anticipated by your preset options. Follow-up questions—like “Can you describe the issue?”—can reveal blind spots or emerging concerns, making your survey much more valuable.
Should you use the NPS question?
The Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a measure of how likely participants are to recommend your live stream or event to others. For live stream quality at conferences, it’s a simple but powerful way to benchmark overall sentiment and compare over time. Since 35% of streaming viewers have abandoned a stream due to buffering, and over a quarter of viewers perceive live streaming as worse than pay TV, a single NPS question helps track loyalty in the face of these challenges. [5][9]
If you want to automatically generate an NPS survey tailored to conference participants and live stream quality, you can jump straight into the builder here.
The power of follow-up questions
We’ve all seen survey responses that don’t really tell you anything—the “meh” reply, the unexplained rating. That’s where follow-ups shine. Instead of settling for a vague answer, follow-up questions probe deeper automatically, making sure you walk away with usable feedback.
Specific’s AI-powered surveys are designed for this. After every response, the AI can instantly ask smart follow-ups in real time, tailored to the participant’s reply. It feels like a conversation with a research expert. Learn more about automatic follow-up questions and why they supercharge your survey results.
Conference participant: "The stream was okay, I guess."
AI follow-up: "Could you share what aspects made it just okay, rather than great?"
Without a follow-up, we’d never know if “okay” means technical glitches or just high expectations—big difference in what needs to be fixed.
How many follow-ups to ask? For most surveys, 2–3 smart follow-ups are enough to get clarity without annoying respondents. You can set this in Specific, and even let participants skip to the next question if they’ve given a clear answer—making the survey both thorough and respectful of everyone’s time.
This makes it a conversational survey: It feels more like a two-way chat than a form—so participants open up, and the insights get richer.
Analyze survey responses with AI: Even if you have pages of feedback, Specific’s AI-powered analysis (see AI survey response analysis) clusters responses, summarizes trends, and gives you the “why behind the what” at a glance. Manual analysis? The days of wrestling with spreadsheets are over.
Automated follow-ups are powerful and new—try generating your own survey to see how much easier and more insightful feedback can be.
How to prompt ChatGPT (or other GPTs) for great live stream quality survey questions
If you’re using ChatGPT or another GPT to help craft a survey, keep your prompts focused but detailed. For example, to generate broad questions:
Suggest 10 open-ended questions for conference participants survey about live stream quality.
The more context you provide, the better your results will be. For example, specify the conference type, if it’s tech-heavy, hybrid, or fully virtual, and your main survey goal:
We ran a hybrid tech conference with 2,000 global participants. Our main concern is live stream reliability and participant satisfaction. Suggest 10 open-ended questions to diagnose pain points and highlight areas for improvement.
Once you have a list, organize your questions:
Look at the questions and categorize them. Output categories with the questions under them.
Then, dive deeper into the categories that matter most:
Generate 10 questions for categories 'technical issues' and 'user experience feedback'.
What is a conversational survey (and why does AI matter)?
Conversational surveys don’t just “ask and move on”—they spark a dialogue, much like talking to a real person. Instead of a cold list of questions, the AI responds to each participant’s input, asking clarifying questions, digging into pain points, and making sure no insight slips through the cracks.
Here’s a quick look at how the process compares:
Manual Surveys | AI-Generated Conversational Surveys |
|---|---|
Static questions with no adaptive logic | Dynamic questions with real-time follow-ups |
Participants drop off early | Higher engagement, feels like chat |
Time-consuming to create and analyze | AI generates and analyzes—saves hours |
Key context can be lost | No question left unexplored |
Why use AI for conference participants surveys? AI survey examples show us how much richer and easier feedback can be when the survey reacts and adapts like a person. The Specific platform offers best-in-class conversational surveys, making feedback collection seamless, enjoyable, and actionable for both creators and respondents. Want to dive in? Check out how to create a survey for live stream quality.
See this live stream quality survey example now
Want the best questions, smarter follow-ups, and AI-powered analysis in one seamless experience? See how easy it is to create your own conversational survey about live stream quality and get deeper, more actionable feedback today with Specific.